0:02 OK? 0:05 I should actually get you whenever you get a chance to look at my notation deposition even after, I think it's good to go the way you. OK, I'll check it out, I got scheduled. 0:16 Oh awesome, OK, that's even better. I couldn't get it, I couldn't get it till Friday the 23rd that wa...

0:02
OK?
0:05
I should actually get you whenever you get a chance to look at my notation deposition even after, I think it's good to go the way you. OK, I'll check it out, I got scheduled.
0:16
Oh awesome, OK, that's even better. I couldn't get it, I couldn't get it till Friday the 23rd that was, I mean, well, these vacations.
0:23
Yeah, which OK, That's a month out.
0:28
June 23rd. June 20. Alright, today, thanks for joining today's May 25th.
0:35
Of course, I don't know why I say that, I don't give the year, I don't know why.
0:42
Well, no date, but anyways.
0:45
So we're going to talk about, maybe we can, we can do a Q and A, generally, but I wanted to talk about the idea, trying to figure out what our data.
0:54
So I'm looking around at the industry, data brokers, systems, machines, things are being used, Things that are being used to collect this data and manage it.
1:10
Or, am I getting this other noise?
1:13
All right, sounds good.
1:14
So anyways, I thought I'd go and pull some articles and we can talk about this but before we do, I just think you don't mind.
1:20
I wanted to talk about a case that took place recently and it's an ongoing saga.
1:26
And this is just another example.
1:28
What can be done, OK?
1:30
And about 4 or 5 years ago, I started working with a couple in California, and they were being audited by the IRS.
1:38
They did, It does some things off shore and whatnot, They call it, shipped on it.
1:42
So anyways, I am, they were in the middle of an audit, and the IRS gave gave these written questions.
1:50
So of course, we're able to collaborate and answer the questions, and ours, of course, did not like the answers.
1:55
Well, we didn't answer them. And in my opinion, we answered completely.
1:59
And so the IRS wanted to have an in person audit.
2:03
So we did the in person audit and we did a transcript of it.
2:07
So we had a co reporting service come into the room with the IRS agents and the people being audible and to take the transfer.
2:14
And that's almost all day. I mean they're complete jerks Irish just wanted to, just push people around.
2:20
So we got the transcript, and I told him I said it's likely that the IRS will refer this to the Department of Justice to filing a case in Federal Court and accuse you of using the Fifth Amendment and refusing to answer the questions.
2:32
Sure enough, couple of months later.
2:35
True to form the OJ files a complaint.
2:37
You know, it lies lies because I do not use the Fifth Amendment. I coached them on this, they did exactly what I told them, they never used that amendment.
2:46
And they never refuse to answer they answered the questions.
2:50
Yep.
2:50
Perfectly, in my opinion, you know, they don't agree, but, nonetheless, so they were told the judge, We want to hold these people in contempt or not answering the questions under the under the audit summons.
3:01
And so they filed a motion to dismiss saying that the Court didn't have jurisdiction because all the questions were answered properly and that the defendants never use the Fifth Amendment. Here's a copy of the transcript you're on these read through every page.
3:18
You'll see that there's no no claim of Fifth Amendment protection whatsoever.
3:23
So this was presented in the motion to dismiss, in addition to we said, that the IRS knows the Court knows, and the DOJ. I should also know that the US. Constitution has nothing to do with an IRS audit to wire.
3:36
You mentioned that we didn't so within a month, the IRS withdrew the case dismissed.
3:43
Never said a word. Never said, Why no legal memorandum, just five, gone.
3:48
So that wasn't good enough for them.
3:50
They had to start a new case, so they got another, whatever, over the same set of facts.
3:55
This time, it was Financial Crimes Network, you didn't fill out these forms properly, OK, So, now we're in the dark net, we're in the middle of this process, and we did some discovery, We're able to go in there, and ask them questions, and so forth.
4:07
So, they produce 1500 pages.
4:09
I think it was 3300 pages, gobbledygook.
4:13
And so we just wrote him a letter back and said, This is gobbledygook.
4:16
You didn't answer any questions, and so because of your non-response, we want to take the deposition of the custodian of the records, and a deposition of the Assessment officer ooooh assess the taxes that you alleged in the complaint.
4:32
Simple enough, right?
4:34
And this is we're talking about 500, $600,000, right?
4:38
So, we went back and forth with the e-discovery efforts to try to schedule a deposition will as soon as the DOJ. Gutter deposition notice, immediately prepared one for the defendants and try to get them into a deposition first. Is we gave them an extra two months to prepare. That way they could complain about the calendar, right?
4:57
But they didn't do that. They just wanted to 20 days from now, which is the minimum.
5:01
So we just found a protective order the day before, It didn't matter that we killed that demo.
5:06
Then they tried it again, they didn't even bother involving the Court, And so our demo was scheduled for May 31st, didn't even make it that far.
5:16
The IRS dismissed the case again.
5:19
And the reason being is, they produced a bunch of ****, claiming that there was a tax liability, so we said, OK, fine.
5:27
We would just wanted to see the foundation of the taks.
5:32
Playing you allege and the complaint you have to prove it as you alleged it. So where's the assessment?
5:39
They didn't want to talk about that. And they didn't want to produce the assessment. Why is that? Because there isn't one.
5:44
The whole thing's a scam.
5:46
So anyways, I just want to share that with you all.
5:48
And all we did was use a couple of basic rules of procedure and tell the truth that's a monumental with that.
5:55
And so that's monumental. I mean, that's big.
5:57
Yeah, if you went to an attorney, he'd be in third chasing your tail for three years, petulant thousand dollars and still end up, you know, losing your lunch sheet.
6:05
So, I just want to share that with you all, just, I guess, it's a positive thing that, you know, you can, you can be discreet yours, I kinda don't even care. I mean, I know, I don't really care that we didn't, I'd just like to talk about the procedure that, my expectation was, that, I mean, it was either now or later, because they're never going to come up with the evidence.
6:25
But if you just stick to some basic procedure, yeah, they have their weakness, too, and if you prepare, that's the thing here, and you can take a quarter quarter into an audit.
6:35
Sometimes you should do that.
6:37
So, anyways, but with that, I just wanted to share with you some articles I just grab over the week and I was, Look, I'm looking around the industry about biometric data, the collection of who's doing it, What is being used to do it? Why are they doing it?
6:52
So, a lot of the collection has to do with using your your phone apps or your interaction with devices and other things, services, and in creating security for your exclusive access to like, your your fingerprint, right? Makes it unique to yourself when you go to login. And I guess that's just a firewall. But then the question is, who's keeping that data And how is it being used?
7:14
And I think that's what I mean. I think it's being used for nefarious purposes.
7:18
Check out what what we're seeing here, like it says, what from financial times?
7:23
How much does your personal data work? We're trying to figure that out. It's a multi-billion dollar data broker industry.
7:29
Multi-billion, OK, so it's approaching $100 billion from what my research so far, all right, very quickly. And you would think, oh, this is not very interesting. Look at this.
7:39
Somebody's biographical data, age, gender, location, this is 50% per thousand people.
7:47
Well, that doesn't sound like it's valuable, right?
7:49
But you'll see, it will be that collected with other data.
7:55
And the resources that are being put into the ability to collect this data is outrageous.
8:01
So it has to tell you, it's worth a lot more than what you're saying here. It's not just this 50% per thousand people and so forth, and so on. It goes on an e-book. If we get other things like this.
8:12
Um, So yeah, for health conditions, right? The more intimate data, Let's say we get our people the more worth, obviously.
8:21
You guys can see this yourself.
8:23
Let's see here.
8:25
There's a chart with profit.
8:27
I can just look over here.
8:29
So luckily got prices on prices and value, consumer data. This is back from 20 13 as 10 years ago.
8:39
I mean, that's then they're just talking about biographical. But they're not even talking about biometric yet.
8:43
That's 10 years ago.
8:47
Mean, we already know that, I mean, look at it this way. I used to use Google to generate leads for different things on the internet.
8:53
And sometimes I would pay $20 just to have a lead.
8:58
It would cost me $20 to get a person to look at my website.
9:01
No.
9:02
So that type of data can be worth a lot of money.
9:10
So here, this is A As you can see by UNICEF data for children, interesting subject, OK, talking about faces, fingerprints and feet.
9:20
They want to identify children UNICEF.
9:24
And you can check this out, if you will. Intercept data for children, you'll find this PDF files 39 pages.
9:31
Look at all this. Talk about biometrics Especially as it relates to children.
9:38
I didn't read this yet but I kinda skimmed over it.
9:43
I think it's the various.
9:45
I think there's something wrong here.
9:47
Do we really need to do this?
9:53
They want to make a foolproof system to track people.
9:56
I Mean, they don't even want to. Maybe they want to make it seamless so you didn't realize your paycheck.
10:09
Yeah, this kind of scary 1 has 2 children specific risks for children. What do you think?
10:15
Right. Like biometric systems. So let's go over here.
10:19
So I go to this website this morning keeps asking me a question sales manager, it's not even a human being Scarier.
10:26
But, look, do the key players companies in the global biometrics market.
10:32
These are ones you never heard of before.
10:37
You think these look like debtor's on your security agreement?
10:43
Uh, I think so, I think they should go right along with Microsoft.
10:49
Amazon, Google Apple, your DMV.
10:55
So what's happening is around the country that our lawmakers are decades behind this, the corporations are going to dictate policy but they don't see this coming.
11:03
They don't see that people are creating what's called mortgages, OK, mortgages on their own private property that the companies already have.
11:13
They didn't realize it, but now they're the debtor.
11:17
Imagine that?
11:22
Yeah, yeah, of course, they've been taken fingerprints and all this, And they just didn't have a system yet. This has been going on for decades, but they didn't have a system yet to use it if someone's advantage.
11:31
So, yeah, let me put the link real quick.
11:33
I mean, I can, I can do this here. I'm gonna put these links in the chat.
11:36
It's, like, you can just Google this stuff.
11:40
See?
11:42
That.
11:50
No.
11:53
Please, if you guys want, find more info on and share with us the polls.
12:01
We're gonna, we're gonna set, we're gonna blaze a trail here, with this security thing, the security agreement.
12:08
Here we go: global biometrics, market size, and share analysis, the growth trends.
12:15
It's segmented by type, hardware, software services, biometric type, the IRS recognition, and geometry, facial recognition. This is the mark of the beast.
12:29
What does the beastie, you guys know what that is yet?
12:33
It's the corporations, Corporations.
12:36
They're saying, hey, that's why they need, there are creatures of that of conscience, right? Any regulations?
12:41
Will the corporations have evolved into software?
12:47
They reach out to us through software.
12:50
Right now, they're about to about to strangle us and not let us have access to resources, and Leslie, submit, OK, this is coming.
12:58
Look at this from this chart here.
13:01
In the next five years, they're projected to more than double the market size and collection and management of biometric data.
13:12
Do you think you're getting into the ground floor, so to speak?
13:15
You're claiming rights are a property. That is undervalued right now.
13:20
How much is your security journey going to be worth in 10 years?
13:26
Private property, case law, apply to security letter.
13:29
Yes, it does.
13:30
If you want to look at some private property case, law wants you to look at intangible private property and I want you to look at the concept of privacy in house, explained as property.
13:42
And yes, if you can describe it, it can be collateral in a security agreement.
13:48
Absolutely you got the right idea.
13:50
Then they come up with this I never heard this or compound annual growth rate. All right, whatever. So apparently, it's going to make a bunch of money for some people.
13:58
And here's your, here's your equation, OK? whatever, that scares me.
14:02
Uh, So that's all I got there.
14:05
I just want to share that with you, That too fast, You gotta go back, You get the idea, though, right?
14:12
You asked me, What's the word?
14:14
Well, look around, look at this infrastructure that's being created.
14:18
You think it has no value.
14:23
Imagine if a thousand ups, or 100,000 or 10000 or something got security agreements.
14:28
Now, if you look in the security agreements, I'm doing I have a little provision in there that says that there's a survivor I don't know that I have an assignment clause, but the survivor would be or the assignee would be. And I take your last name. I call it Your family trust.
14:41
Just in case you ever want to assign them the rights to the security, getting out of our way to a third party, you can do that, OK, that's your way out. Once you've done that, you can do it again, right?
14:52
We can always change that. We can make it an LLC, whatever you want.
14:55
I'm just thinking, what if we consolidate these these agreements and create a pool of funds like the banks do and use it as collateral for something money?
15:06
Maybe we set up a corporation in which the share value is based on all the security.
15:12
You think we have some power against all these corporations?
15:17
Sure. Hope. sounds like that.
15:20
That's a great idea.
15:23
So there's more we can do with this thing. Let's see if I can get to the last like, Invest OPV LMC lightly.
15:30
If it doesn't work, just kind of the links aren't showing up in chat. Are you putting them in shattering Telegram?
15:36
They're in chat.
15:39
I don't see any.
15:43
Oh, do you see it re?
15:46
Now, I'm down, OK, Know, You guys just private message somebody.
15:53
Yeah.
15:57
Yeah, The dataset, that's a good thing, I mean, check it out, let's see here.
16:01
UNICEF, I mean, I think we would have more insight than most people that read this because I don't get it.
16:08
But here, oh, let me see if I can, I was, I was saying it.
16:15
Center.
16:22
I don't know why it's I don't know how to make it go to everybody that's not like me.
16:30
OK, here we go.
16:31
I'm gonna switch Alright, so sorry about that cares that UNICEF thing now. Do you guys see it?
16:36
Yes, yes, OK, great.
16:39
Because I just don't know what year so anyways Uh, Yeah.
16:44
Right.
16:46
Oh, and by the way, I forgot to show you this.
16:48
There's an actual calculator somebody came with a calculator that together a value It's just a guide.
16:54
No, It's nothing official, have them yet, but.
17:05
She can't be found.
17:07
Let me give you a, maybe a different one, OK, yeah.
17:11
She can't be Pam, probably Google.
17:17
Oh, and here's a bunch of money.
17:20
OK, now, this Calculator Heroes, tell it I didn't go that Bro. Show you.
17:29
Little.
17:33
Got a quick question for you, go ahead.
17:36
Um, some years back, they started to change their protocol for international flights. And they have a, they have a third party contractor, and they're quite aggressive about it, but they get all your biometric data.
17:52
And, you know, when you fly back in from Europe, for example, and Atlanta, you have to go through.
17:59
And they want they have these machines that take care, picture, your face, and then you scan your fingerprints.
18:09
Yes, so, So, that's, it's, it's pretty intrusive, it's pretty aggressive.
18:15
They're acting on part for the US Government, as a contractor, like Haliburton, like Lockheed Martin, Right.
18:22
So, they think they have all these rights.
18:23
So, and I'm getting ready to, I'm getting ready to do some International flying.
18:30
And I'm curious, the best way to, know, to negotiate with them first I refuse. But then I do my same thing. What, what is the legal, right?
18:43
What is your purpose?
18:44
How will you store it? Where will my data be stored? What is your line? And get it all in writing, be like, I need this in writing.
18:52
Mean, I have to find out the responsible people, because you can't talk with the morals, but, you know, but, by that time, it's too late. You go ahead of time.
18:59
You got, works something out, but what happens if you refuse?
19:05
I imagine, they probably take you in a separate room and, you know, try to scare you until you have, you know, you have no rights and intimidate you.
19:12
Because, like you said, you're you're dealing with, the police officer pulls you over, right?
19:18
What jurisdiction would you be in when you have this situation?
19:22
Well, it's at a border. It's at a border coming back into the United States.
19:25
So, you're at a federal airport, so you're on federal territory, and it's basically border entry.
19:33
So, you know, you have to the states.
19:35
That's right.
19:36
So once you, when you're coming back from say, you know, like Amsterdam, or Europe, or, you know, England back into the state, so everything that I just spoke about applies here. So, that's what I'm thinking. Yeah. So it's all the United States. So who, who is an agency that I'd say? So, it is the United States.
19:54
And that is the TSA else.
19:58
And then whoever, whatever company is doing this, Yeah, if you could give me that information that the company said, I'll go do some research and I'll help you with the security agreement, and I would even set up a correspondence with them and ask them, you know, all these questions, know, about your day rotation policy and this sort of thing ahead of time.
20:15
Yeah, I'd like to, I'd like to front run all of it before, before I do it, to put them on notice, essentially.
20:23
OK, yeah, well, that's fantastic. I wanna, I want to do that because it's a certainly a humiliating experience.
20:29
Yeah, yeah. And I appreciate your comments. You know, I know, I imagine that in Israel, like, you're saying that you don't have a choice. They're using biometrics already.
20:38
That's the way it is. And, you know, by the way, I mean your photos.
20:41
It is biometric data.
20:44
That's right, I mean, even the cop pulls you over. He makes, he looks to see it as you're the guy. That's biometric, David. Do this for decades. We just didn't realize it.
20:52
That's right. Yeah.
20:54
That's right.
20:57
OK, and if someone said, OK, if you said, if you shoot somebody, and there's a, there's a default situation, what you can do is, OK, the other party can always answer late. But you can.
21:08
You can, you should apply to the clerk for the entry of default. So the court just looked at the data, and says, OK, it was served on this date. Here's the return of service. And there's been no answer. Document gets.
21:19
Therefore, I'm gonna say it's the clerk that he's late. Then once you get the entry of default, you file a motion for default judgement, which requires a hearing. Then notices must notice, must be served to the already through the reservation. I'll be served it.
21:33
Then you give them a second chance, basically.
21:35
So if they wanted to, reasonably within about a 30 day period, even after the late for 30 days, they could file a response and ask the court for permission to file late, if they give a decent reason.
21:47
So, but yeah, I agree with you. I would ask the clerk for an entry of default, that's going to give birth.
21:52
Use your image, they're going to take. They're going to try to take our biometric data. So, this I'm saying, if you have the security given in place, you're like a covered here, you're protected. They collect this data. Now, they just dumped down a huge liability, and they gave you a heck of a cause of action against.
22:06
I'm not sure exactly how that plays out yet, but this is going to be about But look at this. I mean, if you look at my shares, Minerva.
22:14
So, the current value of a person's data has given up his age, gender, all this stuff.
22:18
It goes away was ****, it's a lot less of my takeaways age.
22:24
I didn't really get this rug.
22:27
Let's, let's say you're a billionaire, yes, OK, so all right.
22:30
So maybe there isn't a billionaire Joked is data's worldwide three times more.
22:39
But like that to timeslot 100 times more.
22:45
Let's say if you're an accountant, OK, you're more valuable as an accountant, then oh, you're more granular chairman, an attorney, oh, why do they were valuable?
22:55
Let's see here about a company owner, that's better than that attorney.
23:01
Entrepreneur, Ooooh, that's even better.
23:06
Are you married? OK, that's a heck of a lot more interesting. I think that's why the IRS gets people to sign jointly.
23:12
They gave introductions, don't you get more to write off or something if you name your kids as, directions?
23:20
Data.
23:23
Alright, so it goes, it goes deeper, we can get go next.
23:26
So you guys see this right IHG dot MT dot com or check that out if you want to ask.
23:33
Don't ask me.
23:34
Asked the world what your data might be worth. I would just say it's been under the law.
23:40
It's going to be worth a lot for money and it's going to be worth a lot more control.
23:47
nine?
23:54
You get around without the documents, This is the thing, I mean, I think they do want that they do want to block access to resources and travel, unless we submitted this new world order system.
24:04
Maybe I'm naive. I think we'd get around it.
24:09
I think we can do that.
24:10
Have to try.
24:12
They said, if we don't, then we should get what we deserve, right?
24:17
That's all I want to show you all tonight. Anybody want to ask anything? You can ask them all upset, like immigration law.
24:22
I, I, can, I know how to go know stuff. But I don't know.
24:26
Immigration law, I have a big idea of things, but I'm not the person you want to talk to.
24:32
Probably going to be an immigration attorney, in fact, I've hired an immigration attorney for my life years ago.
24:38
I don't want to deal with that.
24:43
I'm more by administrative. You've got administrative issue with immigration, Like, we had one.
24:48
while back. Gentleman was for Russia. And he was, he was willing to renew his Visa, and the US would do it because of the big pandemic nonsense.
24:57
So, there was a provision on one of the application, on the, on the documents, where you have to, if the United States a reason, why you should not be have your visa renewed, and it was on block forwarding.
25:13
So, I'm black 40, it was an open-ended response. And so I wrote a response.
25:18
And my response was to accuse the United States of genocide, that there is no pandemic, and to stop doing this as a condition for renewing my visa.
25:26
All other things being equal, I should have my, my Visa renewed, and they renewed it.
25:32
They didn't even argue, right? They didn't respond. I didn't know what else to do with that case.
25:35
Because I mean, I cited the Nuremberg Code because that apply, because it's an international treaty. And I accuse the United States and violating International Treaty and genocide.
25:46
And they just renewed as nisa without argument.
25:49
Maybe the guy who read it says, Oh, ****, I'm not gonna talk about this.
25:54
Yeah.
25:59
Interesting, not great.
26:01
I'm gonna go and this into a tomorrow's bike ride that I mentioned to you guys a couple of weeks ago here in Orlando.
26:08
Our last is that the bike ride of the people who are fighting hip hop, skip it, he duda. I don't know what that is. I know biggest children now that we're not doing that is called critical mass. It's like 1200 crazy people that ride their bikes in downtown Friday night.
26:27
Take up all the streets.
26:32
Yeah, hey Marcia, let me know. We can talk about some things that's an interesting subject.
26:36
Please, please set up a time, or just shoot me a text, if you guys want to set the time. But so much easier to go to ... points.
26:43
Just schedule something, Most people have a coupon code by now, so, hey, straight. Do you have a question?
26:49
Hey, yeah, I did, just, I just want to kind of verify. So, where are we with the biometric data, that's just we need to set something up with you pay for it, But you've got it all figured out and whatnot If you would just tell me who you want the data to be. I'll do the research, Find Out if it's Google already got the research done. Like, what about like stores, I went into Martial Arts.
27:09
I'm like, Geez, they've got cameras all over the place, and I'm sure that it is a collection of your biometric data and tell you a bit of surveillance.
27:16
So certainly, let's go ahead, and let's just name the store.
27:19
I do a little research to find out who the General Counsel is. I find out who the exact legal name is like Bloomberg, and all these things.
27:26
Get your name, exactly the name, and then your address. And then we just open there. There's a couple other things, and then, like I was talking about this evening, how do we figure out what kind of value.
27:36
We'll just say this.
27:37
We're not going to go wrong, trying to get a good idea of what the value of the data is.
27:42
just try to do your best, to get the value.
27:44
We can't go wrong, OK. Yeah let's, let's end Marshall's.
27:49
Yeah that target features, I think they want it. I think you want us to implode the retail operations because I think they want to operate your distribution centers through drones. Yeah. I think that's what they want to do that, Yeah.
28:01
We'll say. All right, well, thanks so much. one quick question, what about doing, that for, like, the City of New York, which has cameras all over the place?
28:13
What? was that a Yes, please do? Yeah, yes, OK, alright. I ... money together to get the perform to you, but I will.
28:22
Yeah, no problem.
28:23
All right, so, Jay, So, I mean, the whole point of this is, is to mean, there's, they're trying to interfere with your ability to travel.
28:35
And they're wanting to shrink and they're starting. They want to stop us from doing international, but then they want to shrink it down and do it more regional, like 15 minutes cities.
28:43
So, the whole, the hope of the security agreement is that, for instance, you know, you serve TSA, then it limits their ability to even maybe request a passport because that's your biometric data.
29:01
I don't, I don't know about the actual, Identify yourself, but what I'm, what I'm having us do is control the data You're still gonna use that passport or things of that nature, as far as I can tell.
29:12
Yeah, I don't have a problem with that. I'm just saying, we should control the data.
29:17
Sure, they're not gonna like the fact that we have the right people, then they don't, and it's going to cost them money.
29:24
Right. If we can touch that.
29:26
Like if we can basically file, I mean, we would file a case against them, and we would bring cleanings against them. We can make a case in a court. We can set up a case, an arbitration forum. There's many things. There's many things we can do. I'm not sure exactly yet, but I know we can protect a security interest in this data that they're collecting. I know that much, and I know it's it's not going to be ignored.
29:46
I know that.
29:47
But as far as traveling and having access to resources, I mean, we're the ones that have entered the technology, So basically, what we need to do is breed the technology and just go use it. Ignore them.
29:58
I'm talking about traveling outside of the borders, traveling outside of customs, can ignore them, just show up on shore. Show up at an airport, show up at a landing strip. Are they gonna have to do that?
30:11
Military?
30:13
Yeah.
30:14
Bring it.
30:17
You can't limit people's, you can't deny them the right to travel.
30:20
You can make it difficult for them, but it's not going to fly, certainly.
30:27
All right, guys.
30:31
We have the right to travel and that, you know for flying in the next couple of months.
30:36
Is there something we should do prior to set up? Like, no, I'm not gonna go along with these certain statutory procedures and stuff.
30:45
That would be just to talk to you to travel. I don't know yet, but what I would suggest is that you identify it was collecting your data and put a security agreement, naming that party as a debtor.
30:56
At least do that much prior to find actual.
31:00
Yeah, don't be a martyr or I mean, ... will look. We'll get the last word.
31:07
Remember, we're the parents are the ones that created this system, right?
31:10
They can, they can joke around all they want, but in the end, we get to say what the bedtime is.
31:18
Yeah, alright.
31:20
And we can actually, you know, if you want stay, we can, we can talk back and forth about doing the research for finding which defense contractors operating.
31:31
No, With TSA at border crossings, if you want we can do that in the base points discussion groups.
31:39
Yeah. Awesome.
31:40
That's what it's for.
31:43
That was good.
31:45
Like, Oh, yeah, this weekend. Thank you to Becky.

Summary

1. The conversation begins with discussing the progress on a notation deposition and a future meeting on June 23rd.
2. They express a desire to delve into data brokers, systems, and the machinery used to gather and manage data.
3. A recent case involving an IRS audit is brought up, with the group expressing dissatisfaction with how they believe they answered all questions thoroughly, but the IRS pushed for an in-person audit.
4. The IRS was predicted to refer the case to the Department of Justice, alleging the defendants used the Fifth Amendment to avoid answering questions, a claim the group denies.
5. After conducting the audit and recording it, they believed they might face accusations in Federal Court; however, a few months later, the case was dismissed without a reason provided by the IRS.
6. Despite the dismissal, the IRS initiated a new case against them concerning financial crimes, but again, the case was dismissed, leading to suspicion of fraudulent activity.
7. They explore the idea of industry practices regarding the collection of biometric data, including who is doing it and why.
8. They also discuss the potential for using these practices as collateral for investments, speculating on creating a corporation based on the value of these security agreements.
9. Concerns are raised about protocols for international flights and biometric data collection, leading to a discussion about potential legal protections.
10. The discussion concludes with an inquiry into what one’s data might be worth and the potential impacts on personal and financial control.

Leave a Reply